On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 19/04/2014 1:29 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 19/04/2014 12:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Jonathan, >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/03/2014 1:01 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This adds the necessary target packages for development with all of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Qt 5 modules. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> | Computing transaction...error: Can't install >>>>>>> qtwayland-dev-5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0@cortexa9hf_vfp_neon: no >>>>>>> package provides qtwayland = 5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0 >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> | Saving cache... >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> | WARNING: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/run.populate_sdk_image.29400:1 >>>>>>> exit 1 from >>>>>>> | smart --data-dir=${target_rootfs}/var/lib/smart install -y >>>>>>> ${pkgs_to_install} >>>>>>> | DEBUG: Python function do_populate_sdk finished >>>>>>> | ERROR: Function failed: populate_sdk_image (log file is located at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/lo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please fix this and test the combinations of enable/disable features. >>>>>>> They seem not well tested. >>>>>>> >>>>>> It looks like qtwayland is not being built properly in your >>>>>> configration. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you provide configuration and steps to reproduce this failure? >>>>>> I have not had any luck in reproducing it. >>>>> >>>>> The wayland packages cannot be installed if wayland distro feature is >>>>> not available. >>>>> >>>> By default, DISTRO_FEATURES does not contain wayland so I wonder if it >>>> makes >>>> sense for to add wayland to DISTRO_FEATURES if it is not available. >>>> Is there a better method than checking if DISTRO_FEATURES has wayland for >>>> qtwayland? >>> >>> You can check for x11 or wayland in this case. But I think qtwayland >>> is useless without wayland in distro features, isn't it? >>> >> I already do check for wayland in DISTRO_FEATURES before including qtwayland >> packages: >> >> ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'wayland', '${USE_WAYLAND}', '', d)} >> >> Is this not enough? >> >> I could perhaps change USE_RUBY, USE_WAYLAND, and USE_X11 to assign with ?= >> instead of = so that the packages depending on those can be excluded from >> the SDK if desired by setting them to "" in local.conf. > > It is. I am rebuilding here and will debug it ...
Alright. It was my fault here. I merged it :-) Sorry for taking so long in checking it. I was out and couldn't get it done before. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
