On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Julien Brianceau (jbriance) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. > > I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license > declaration in chromium recipes. > Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through > chromium.inc file. > Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official contain > third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD licensed, > whereas it is compiled by the recipe. > > Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared in > the recipe as well ?
Yes, they should. The crosswalk browser recipe seems to do a pretty good job and could be a starting point for other Chromium based recipes. https://github.com/crosswalk-project/meta-crosswalk/blob/master/recipes-crosswalk/crosswalk/crosswalk_12.40.295.0.bb > Regards, > > Julien > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
