Thanks for the comments. I'm going to clean up the recipes and I'm trying to upstream some of the patches to chromium to reduce the maintenance on meta-browser.
Z On 24 October 2015 at 06:39, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Julien Brianceau (jbriance) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. > > > > I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license > declaration in chromium recipes. > > Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through > chromium.inc file. > > Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official > contain third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD > licensed, whereas it is compiled by the recipe. > > > > Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared > in the recipe as well ? > > Yes, they should. The crosswalk browser recipe seems to do a pretty > good job and could be a starting point for other Chromium based > recipes. > > > https://github.com/crosswalk-project/meta-crosswalk/blob/master/recipes-crosswalk/crosswalk/crosswalk_12.40.295.0.bb > > > Regards, > > > > Julien > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- Zoltan Kuscsik Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group email: [email protected] IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
