> Am 27.10.2015 um 21:24 schrieb Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Am 27.10.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Otavio Salvador >>> <[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> llvm introduced new JIT technology MCJIT with llvm 3.4 and fixes ARM in 3.5 >>>> (see >>>> http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#changes-to-the-arm-backend). >>>> >>>> Ensure JIT is built with llvm >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> >>> >>> There is a patch to add LLVM 3.7[1]; I think this one can be dropped. >>> >>> 1. http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/106281/ >> >> I'v seen this and I guarantee that OpenJDK-8 will fail heavily with llvm3.7 >> - the guys >> put an end to an antiquated API's with each release, and OpenJDK's zeroshark >> uses lot's >> of them. > > So we will need to figure how to deal with this. I see following options: > > - add needed llvm recipe in meta-java (I dislike this) > - fix openjdk > - update openjdk so it work with 3.7 (preferred)
I would prefer that, too - but we have to find a sponsor for that. We also have the option to have an llvm3.5 for a while in meta-oe ;) Cheers -- Jens Rehsack - [email protected] -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
