On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:24:52PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Am 27.10.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Otavio Salvador > >> <[email protected]>: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> llvm introduced new JIT technology MCJIT with llvm 3.4 and fixes ARM in > >>> 3.5 > >>> (see > >>> http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#changes-to-the-arm-backend). > >>> > >>> Ensure JIT is built with llvm > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> > >> > >> There is a patch to add LLVM 3.7[1]; I think this one can be dropped. > >> > >> 1. http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/106281/ > > > > I'v seen this and I guarantee that OpenJDK-8 will fail heavily with llvm3.7 > > - the guys > > put an end to an antiquated API's with each release, and OpenJDK's > > zeroshark uses lot's > > of them. > > So we will need to figure how to deal with this. I see following options: > > - add needed llvm recipe in meta-java (I dislike this) > - fix openjdk > - update openjdk so it work with 3.7 (preferred)
I don't mind having all 3 llvm versions in parallel until all this is sorted out. People can select the right one based on mesa version they are using and 3.8 for OpenJDK. But I would appreciate this recipe rebased on top of Philip's (or vice versa), because I don't have spare time to text it with newer mesa Philip is using or with OpenJDK Jens is using. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
