to fix the build, two patches where needed.

One which just adds an include of unistd.h, as the functions pipe, write and
close defined by this include, weren't defined.

The other patch enables the build to build the tools of libdbus-c++ for the
target, which, without the patch, will always be build for the host, even when
cross compiling.

Signed-off-by: Thilo Cestonaro <[email protected]>
---
 .../fix-missing-unistd.h-include.patch             | 12 +++++++++++
 .../remove-CXX_FOR_BUILD-stuff.patch               | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++_0.9.0.bb     | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/fix-missing-unistd.h-include.patch
 create mode 100644 
meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/remove-CXX_FOR_BUILD-stuff.patch
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++_0.9.0.bb

diff --git 
a/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/fix-missing-unistd.h-include.patch
 
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/fix-missing-unistd.h-include.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5cb8096
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/fix-missing-unistd.h-include.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+diff --git a/include/dbus-c++/eventloop-integration.h 
b/include/dbus-c++/eventloop-integration.h
+index 1b0302e..3e44304 100644
+--- a/include/dbus-c++/eventloop-integration.h
++++ b/include/dbus-c++/eventloop-integration.h
+@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
+ #define __DBUSXX_EVENTLOOP_INTEGRATION_H
+ 
+ #include <errno.h>
++#include <unistd.h>
+ #include "api.h"
+ #include "dispatcher.h"
+ #include "util.h"
diff --git 
a/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/remove-CXX_FOR_BUILD-stuff.patch 
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/remove-CXX_FOR_BUILD-stuff.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..906470a
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++-0.9.0/remove-CXX_FOR_BUILD-stuff.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+diff -Naur libdbus-c++-0.9.0.ori/configure.ac libdbus-c++-0.9.0/configure.ac
+--- libdbus-c++-0.9.0.ori/configure.ac 2016-11-15 14:25:36.085882774 +0100
++++ libdbus-c++-0.9.0/configure.ac     2016-11-15 14:27:08.814568717 +0100
+@@ -64,9 +64,6 @@
+ AC_PROG_CC
+ AC_PROG_CXX
+ 
+-CXX_FOR_BUILD=${CXX_FOR_BUILD-${CXX}}
+-AC_SUBST(CXX_FOR_BUILD)
+-
+ AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
+ 
+ PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG
+diff -Naur libdbus-c++-0.9.0.ori/tools/Makefile.am 
libdbus-c++-0.9.0/tools/Makefile.am
+--- libdbus-c++-0.9.0.ori/tools/Makefile.am    2016-11-15 14:25:36.089882803 
+0100
++++ libdbus-c++-0.9.0/tools/Makefile.am        2016-11-15 14:26:19.454203583 
+0100
+@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
+ # hacky, but ...
+ 
+-CXX = $(CXX_FOR_BUILD)
+-
+ AM_CPPFLAGS = \
+       $(dbus_CFLAGS) \
+       $(xml_CFLAGS) \
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++_0.9.0.bb 
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++_0.9.0.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7edaffc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/dbus/libdbus-c++_0.9.0.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+SUMMARY = "DBus-C++ Library"
+DESCRIPTION = "DBus-c++ attempts to provide a C++ API for D-BUS. The library 
has a glib and an Ecore mainloop integration. It also offers an optional own 
main loop."
+HOMEPAGE = "http://dbus-cplusplus.sourceforge.net";
+SECTION = "base"
+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=fbc093901857fcd118f065f900982c24"
+DEPENDS = "dbus glib-2.0 libpcre"
+
+SRC_URI = 
"${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/project/dbus-cplusplus/dbus-c++/${PV}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.gz
 \
+                  file://fix-missing-unistd.h-include.patch \
+                  file://remove-CXX_FOR_BUILD-stuff.patch"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "e752116f523fa88ef041e63d3dee4de2"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"bc11ac297b3cb010be904c72789695543ee3fdf3d75cdc8225fd371385af4e61"
+
+EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-ecore --disable-examples --disable-tests"
+
+inherit autotools pkgconfig
+
+PACKAGES += "${PN}-tools"
+
+FILES_${PN} = "${libdir}"
+FILES_${PN}-tools = "${bindir}"
+
+BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
-- 
2.10.2

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to