[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent] On 17.02.24 (Fri 22:33) MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> Yeah. If you're near a keyboard, please go ahead and revert otherwise > I'll get to in later on tonight. Bah. This isn't just the revert I'd been hoping for. Samba, as usual, is a pain. My builds without gvfs are still happy, but reverting the patch breaks all builds, AFAICT, so I'm going to leave this alone until I sort out what the correct repair job looks like here. Unless someone comes up with a solution before I get to it. The weekend is rather full right now, I'm afraid. -J. > > On Feb 24, 2017 5:01 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > Joe? > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Andreas Müller > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Szombathelyi György > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If there's no solution to resolve the conflict between the internal > > tevent and the external one, then maybe putting the libtevent-internal.h > > from the external lib to the samba tree would be a way to go. > > > > Br, > > György > > -------- Eredeti levél -------- > > Feladó: Andreas Müller > > <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com<http://googlemail.com>> > > Dátum: 2017 február 20 12:52:18 > > Tárgy: Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent > > Címzett: > > openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org<http://lists.openembedded.org> > > > > <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org<http://lists.openembedded.org>> > > > > > In last build I've noticed only this new issue related to samba: > > > > > > ctdb-2.5.6: ctdb rdepends on samba, but it isn't a build > > dependency, missing samba in DEPENDS or PACKAGECONFIG? [build-deps] > > > > > > Maybe this dependency was created from samba being libldb provider in > > > this build. > > > > > > gvfs and whole meta-gnome layers is still included in my world, maybe > > it > > > didn't fail because some gvfs dependency was already failing or > > one of > > > samba related changes in master-next is fixing this one. > > > > > Some background: During last weekend I prepared a series based on > > master-next unblacklisting. First target is to build a xfce-image > > again [1]. Last step yesterday evening should be rebasing against > > latest master-next and run a test build. That failed for gvfs - so I > > stopped sending stuff. Now I know why gvfs fails... > > > > How do we proceed with this patch? > > > > [1] https://github.com/schnitzeltony/meta-openembedded/tree/work-2017-02 > > > Just notices that this patch made it into master breaking at least gvfs. > Revert? > > Andreas > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > -- -Joe MacDonald. :wq
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
