> My builds without gvfs are still happy, but reverting the patch breaks all builds
What gets broken? When I removed this change from master-next after Andreas's report I haven't seen any new issue and the gvfs one was indeed fixed after that. I'll include revert at least in master-next to see what it does with next bitbake world. On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Joe MacDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent] On > 17.02.24 (Fri 22:33) MacDonald, Joe wrote: > > > Yeah. If you're near a keyboard, please go ahead and revert otherwise > > I'll get to in later on tonight. > > Bah. This isn't just the revert I'd been hoping for. Samba, as usual, > is a pain. My builds without gvfs are still happy, but reverting the > patch breaks all builds, AFAICT, so I'm going to leave this alone until > I sort out what the correct repair job looks like here. Unless someone > comes up with a solution before I get to it. The weekend is rather full > right now, I'm afraid. > > -J. > > > > > On Feb 24, 2017 5:01 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Joe? > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Andreas Müller < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Szombathelyi György <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > If there's no solution to resolve the conflict between the > internal tevent and the external one, then maybe putting the > libtevent-internal.h from the external lib to the samba tree would be a way > to go. > > > > > > Br, > > > György > > > -------- Eredeti levél -------- > > > Feladó: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com< > http://googlemail.com>> > > > Dátum: 2017 február 20 12:52:18 > > > Tárgy: Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in > libtevent > > > Címzett: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org<http://lists. > openembedded.org> <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org< > http://lists.openembedded.org>> > > > > > > > In last build I've noticed only this new issue related to > samba: > > > > > > > > ctdb-2.5.6: ctdb rdepends on samba, but it isn't a build > dependency, missing samba in DEPENDS or PACKAGECONFIG? [build-deps] > > > > > > > > Maybe this dependency was created from samba being libldb > provider in > > > > this build. > > > > > > > > gvfs and whole meta-gnome layers is still included in my world, > maybe it > > > > didn't fail because some gvfs dependency was already failing > or one of > > > > samba related changes in master-next is fixing this one. > > > > > > > Some background: During last weekend I prepared a series based on > > > master-next unblacklisting. First target is to build a xfce-image > > > again [1]. Last step yesterday evening should be rebasing against > > > latest master-next and run a test build. That failed for gvfs - so I > > > stopped sending stuff. Now I know why gvfs fails... > > > > > > How do we proceed with this patch? > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/schnitzeltony/meta- > openembedded/tree/work-2017-02 > > > > > Just notices that this patch made it into master breaking at least gvfs. > Revert? > > > > Andreas > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > [email protected]<mailto:Openem > [email protected]> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > > > > -- > -Joe MacDonald. > :wq > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
