On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Belisko Marek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Robert, > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Robert P. J. Day > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Belisko Marek wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > is there some rationale for libgpiod.bb to be the lone recipe > >> > under meta-openembedded/meta? would that recipe not fit into some > >> > other layer? > > > >> I posted few days ago recipe for libgpiod. Please look at: > >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/ > 2017-May/112810.html > > > > but that doesn't really answer the question as to why that recipe > > went into meta-openembedded/meta and not meta-openembedded/meta-oe. > > even the subject refers to "meta-oe", so why was that recipe placed in > > a directory named "meta"? was that perhaps a typo? > Yes probably type. First version of patch was placed in meta-oe. My > bad. I'll fix that but didn't get any feedback on patch yet. Thanks. > Your patch was already merged with the 'suspicious' path. I'd suggest sending a new patch that moves it under meta-oe/. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
