On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Andrea Galbusera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Belisko Marek <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Robert P. J. Day >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Belisko Marek wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > is there some rationale for libgpiod.bb to be the lone recipe >> >> > under meta-openembedded/meta? would that recipe not fit into some >> >> > other layer? >> > >> >> I posted few days ago recipe for libgpiod. Please look at: >> >> >> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-May/112810.html >> > >> > but that doesn't really answer the question as to why that recipe >> > went into meta-openembedded/meta and not meta-openembedded/meta-oe. >> > even the subject refers to "meta-oe", so why was that recipe placed in >> > a directory named "meta"? was that perhaps a typo? >> Yes probably type. First version of patch was placed in meta-oe. My >> bad. I'll fix that but didn't get any feedback on patch yet. Thanks. > > > Your patch was already merged with the 'suspicious' path. I'd suggest > sending a new patch that moves it under meta-oe/. Hmm thanks. I wasn't aware of that that it was already merged. Thanks I'll post updated version.
BR, marek -- as simple and primitive as possible ------------------------------------------------- Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA Freelance Developer Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic Tel: +421 915 052 184 skype: marekwhite twitter: #opennandra web: http://open-nandra.com -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
