On 9/6/17 3:35 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You are missing the point. We DO need a replacement. However, I was unable >> to >> find one. With the few references I found when searching that there was no >> replacement, and it was effectively obsolete (and removed in other >> distributions), I followed their example. >> >> As I said in the header, I don't believe this set is completely right. But >> it's >> a first stab and what it took for me to pass the testing script. >> >> I am retesting with this patch and the removal of gstreamer removed from the >> test set (it will take a while, I've got -30,000- tasks to run through for a >> test). It's possible that something else in the system was triggering a >> fault >> that caused gstreamer-0.10 to fail and that was resolved elsewhere. >> >> I tested the original work against master, but rebased to master-next after >> talking w/ Martin... I then spot checked the modified recipes that they were >> still working after the rebase. >> >>> And please don't even think about running your magic script for >>> meta-qt5-extra or send patches. >> >> Again, you are missing the point here. Someone has to start this work. It's >> the layer maintainers decision to accept or reject the patches, not mine.. >> but >> I feel it's my obligation as a community member to submit the patches I >> create >> to the community layers that I use. I also feel it's my obligation as a >> patch >> submitter to explain why (or why not) they are necessary for my specific >> use-case. (In this case, passing a specific compatibility test script.) >> >> --Mark >> >>> Over and out >>> >>> Andreas >>> >> > I am sure that I miss the point again but fedora - for me > reference/inspiration many times - has no problem with xfce4-mixer > [1]. > > [1] > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfce4-mixer.git/tree/xfce4-mixer.spec
arch - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=222294 debian - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785846 mageia - https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=10018 Fedora - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355763 etc... This is what I based the original commit message on. Just an FYI, the first part of my test WITHOUT the xfce4-mixer and gstreamer-0.10 removal just passed. I will let it continue and will report on the status once the full test is complete. (full test as in bitbake world) --Mark > Andreas > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
