On 9/6/17 3:53 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: >>> I am sure that I miss the point again but fedora - for me >>> reference/inspiration many times - has no problem with xfce4-mixer >>> [1]. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfce4-mixer.git/tree/xfce4-mixer.spec >> >> arch - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=222294 >> debian - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785846 >> mageia - https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=10018 >> Fedora - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355763 > ^ Yes you should look into this - that is exactly the problem I have. >> >> etc... This is what I based the original commit message on. >> >> Just an FYI, the first part of my test WITHOUT the xfce4-mixer and >> gstreamer-0.10 removal just passed. > Passed what exactly?
../scripts/yocto-compat-layer.py meta-openembedded bitbake -S none world bitbake -S none universe bitbake xfce4-mixer florence (with opengl and x11 distro features enabled, and commercial license flag set) bitbake world (bringing in additional recipes that may collide or otherwise impact with the two versions of gstreamer) is what I have in progress. The next step will be to verify packagegroups/images can at least construct something without generating a file conflict error. --Mark >> I will let it continue and will report on >> the status once the full test is complete. (full test as in bitbake world) >> >> --Mark >> > Andreas > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
