On 03/19/2018 03:47 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > 2) I plan removing meta-filesystem and moving recipes to other layers. > > I don't have a strong opinion about this, but why meta-filesystems? It was an easy on to pick on. Mostly because of its size. smbnetfs has a dependency on samba which is in meta-networking, so it has to move, IMHO
> In previous discussion there were some requests for smaller, better > manageable layers and this one with 19 recipes and only dependency on > oe-core and meta-oe doesn't look too bad from that POV. I don't recall that conversation but thanks for the context. I am just trying to shake the tree to see what makes sense to change. There are currently 7 maintainers listed, many in-active. > > If you move some recipes from it to meta-oe, then some people might > complain even more that meta-oe has too many recipes and doesn't serve > any specific purpose. Thanks for the questions and feedback. - armin > > Regards, > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com > <mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 2:32 PM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com > <mailto:akuster...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have been reviewing the meta-openembedded sub-layers and I plan on > > taking the following actions: > > > > Please keep your comments focused on the 3 items below. > > > > > > 1) I plan on resetting the sub-layer maintainers. Several > maintainers > > listed have been inactive. > > > > If a currently listed maintainer is interested in continuing, please > > send me an email. I plan on removing in-active maintainers in > 12 days ( > > March 30th). > > > > This sounds like a good plan. > > > > > 2) I plan removing meta-filesystem and moving recipes to other > layers. > > > > LGTM, this also means some changes in external layers who might > depends on this layer explicitly. I hope those layer maintainers will > take needed action. > > > > > 3) Meta-gnome, I have heard feed back regarding this layer. Does it > > make sense to remove it and push needed recipes out to other > layers? > > > > Agreed here again, I have only fixed this layer in past to keep it > afloat to > reduce compile failures e.g. with clang or musl. > > > > > I want to get any restructuring done prior to sumo release to lessen > > impact on the Sumo maintainer. > > > > > > regards, > > > > Armin > > > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > <mailto:Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org> > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel> > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > <mailto:Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel> > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel