On 04/08/2018 02:00 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 10:39 PM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 03/19/2018 08:59 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 02:32:15PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> I have been reviewing the meta-openembedded sub-layers and I plan on >>>> taking the following actions: >>>> >>>> Please keep your comments focused on the 3 items below. >>>> >>>> >>>> 1) I plan on resetting the sub-layer maintainers. Several maintainers >>>> listed have been inactive. >>>> >>>> If a currently listed maintainer is interested in continuing, please >>>> send me an email. I plan on removing in-active maintainers in 12 days ( >>>> March 30th). >> Patches going out today. >> >>>> >>>> 2) I plan removing meta-filesystem and moving recipes to other layers. >> Based on Martin's response, I keep meta-filesystem around one more release. >>>> >>>> 3) Meta-gnome, I have heard feed back regarding this layer. Does it >>>> make sense to remove it and push needed recipes out to other layers? >>>> >>>> >>>> I want to get any restructuring done prior to sumo release to lessen >>>> impact on the Sumo maintainer. >>> I would suggest that for sumo, any layers that do get moved / >>> re-distributed / whatever, a "dummy" version be kept in place that says >>> where it moved to (or where recipes were migrated to, or whatever is >>> appropriate) and then they can be dropped in master. >>> >> For meta-gnome I decided to BLACKLIST all remaining recipes with planes >> to remove them for Thud. This follows the current blacklist policy. >> >> - Armin >> > Sorry but this email slipped through for me. Was busy getting sumo > into shape. BTW: have still not the slightest idea what patches might > get applied - so I'll stop to send out more.
I have all patches either in stagging/master-next which I need to merge to master-next. I have stagging/master-next2 with all the new ones after the build started. master-next2 gets built at home to get a sense of new patches before investing the very long world builds. I think I have all your patches. > > FWIW > > * I want to continue maintaining meta-xfce. That is good. I have you down for that. thanks. > * I still don't like killing meta-gnome. But go on I'll do my own > layer for those recipe I take care of. I am tired of people > complaining instead sending patches. This is kind of consumer > mentality I wouldn't expect here. I have put killing meta-gnome on hold for the next 6 months so we can figure out what to do. I am black listing recipes that appear not being used. We can un-blacklist them as we find there are needs. To be honest, It might make more sense to move the meta-oe/recipes-gnome to the meta-gnome. It will make meta-oe smaller and might make meta-gnome more relevant. - armin > > Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel