Hi André, again: thank you and feel free to add Acked-by: Richard Leitner <[email protected]>
regards;Richard.L On 07/27/2018 03:29 PM, André Draszik wrote: > From: André Draszik <[email protected]> > > Using MULTI_PROVIDER_WHITELIST, we can instruct Bitbake to not complain > if multiple recipes provide or runtime provide the same Java environment. > > This is a common use-case, and Java packages don't conflict with each > other as they are typically installed under a different prefix, while still > providing (more or less) the same features. > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <[email protected]> > --- > conf/layer.conf | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf > index 3b00f61..8b2978a 100644 > --- a/conf/layer.conf > +++ b/conf/layer.conf > @@ -14,3 +14,6 @@ LICENSE_PATH += "${LAYERDIR}/licenses" > SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE += "\ > ca-certificates-java \ > " > + > +MULTI_PROVIDER_WHITELIST_append = " ${@' > '.join('virtual/java'+str(x)+'-sdk-native > virtual/java'+str(x)+'-runtime-native' for x in range(5,9))}" > +MULTI_PROVIDER_WHITELIST_append = " ${@' > '.join('virtual/java'+str(x)+'-runtime' for x in range(5,9))}" > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
