Hi,
Please see my comments in-line.
On 01/05/2020 00:13, Richard Leitner wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:43:46PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
Hi,
Is this supposed to work with host gcc 9?
Yes, for me it works with "gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2)"
Hmm for gcc (Ubuntu 9.2.1-17ubuntu1~16.04) 9.2.1 20191102
it needs additional CFLAGS.
Do we really need to distinguish also Distros and/or 9.3 vs. 9.2??
Does it do any harm if you add this?
https://github.com/RobertBerger/meta-java/commit/3db52ddcb7771e989cf39048a7b084d040d6b5b0
This was the first test I did and it bombed.
I used all upstream unmodified dunfell branches plus your branch.
same did I on my Fedora box and it built and succeeded tests... That's
strange.
Have you a clean build?
Yes all fresh and also no SSTATE or SSTATE cache.
If you would like to reproduce the problem I can provide you with ssh
access to my build environment to show you quickly.
The build docker container I use is this one:
https://hub.docker.com/r/reliableembeddedsystems/poky-container/tags
Tag: ubuntu-16.04-gcc-9
Also I believe it can be easily reproduced with a "dirty" build as well,
if I remove my 2 lines and just build icedtea-native.
regards;rl
Regards,
Robert
Regards,
Robert
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#84172):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/84172
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72312277/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/leave/8024792/1994799631/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
