> Sorry but my feeling is this suddent interest from S.A. in OCB is more about > "control" and "fear"... If you really want to help, stop spreading FUD
No. Sorry if I was not clear. My only intention is to have an ocb branch that works so that people can rely on it and we can easily merge it in stable to improve ocb. I seriously think that if we define a better policy and process than the current one, ocb can become a great way to improve community contribution to the stable branch. I also think that if you continue diverging from the stable and accept anything in ocb branches, ocb will become less and less interesting for the community. My preceeding mail is may be too rude. But I really thing it's important for ocb branch to setup a test server and a better merge policy. As I said; this is my point of view and we will support your decision about what you want to do with ocb. > and start showing that you respect and appreciate the work from our > community, and that is only possible with ACTIONS, not words.... I do appreciate the community and such great contribution. (OpenERP would not be open source, if we did not have an inconditionaly full support for open source and community) If I participate to these mail, it's to help ocb move forward and do even better. Do you think it's better if don't tell you what we think? I think ocb can be great if we improve a few things (runbot, clear policy, stricter code review) and that's the reason why I give you my point of view. Fabien _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
