+1 Joel. Couldn't be better explained El 01/07/2014 08:59, "Joël Grand-Guillaume" < [email protected]> escribió:
> Hi, > > > I completely agree with Nhomar. The OCA is not trying to take all the > localizations "under control". The OCA is organized as teams per area > (accounting, logistics, ...) and countries. Those teams can organize them > self as they want and as it is written on our website : > > *"""The association is not interested in controlling the association > projects. However, the association projects are expected to follow some > association rules, mostly around the need to ensure that project code is > not legally encumbered (e.g., not stolen, or improperly contributed), and > that appropriate controls are in place to ensure code is properly > contributed"""* > > That's it ! > > Then, we force no body to push their localization here, everyone is free > to chose. If they come, they will decide who will be in the team. The > reviewers will help to review their code to improve the quality as much as > possible. We'll also provide them a travis configuration to review PEP8 and > other code standards + a runbot to allow people to tests their devs from a > functional point of view. > > By being within the OCA, you will gain visibility and benefit reviews and > an organized infrastructure, but your Country team will still be the owner > of the code and responsible for it. > > We don't claim to be holistic and paralyze the economics and self > organizing properties of the eco-system. *We offer a common place where > contributors within a same area can have a common place to work together > and organize their self as they want to !* > > Best regards, > > Joël > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Nhomar Hernández <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> 2014-06-30 10:29 GMT-04:30 Raphael Valyi <[email protected]>: >> >> In this moving target context, I believe only a small subset of >>> localization work deserve OCA consolidation. >>> >> >> Raph. >> >> Just FYI, it is exactly the objective all what you mean. >> >> Local communities will own them repositories, is just to have a "common >> index of localizations" what is being done today. >> >> It means. >> >> Today: lp:openerp-spain managed by openerp-spain team. >> Tomorrow: github.com/oca/l10n-spain managed by oca/spain team. >> >> Done in community, >> >> Today: lp:openerp-venezuela-localization managed by openerp-venezuela >> team. >> Tomorrow: github.com/oca/l10n-venezuela managed by oca/venezuela team. >> >> Done 98% by vauxoo but the names are exactly as today, agnostic to our >> company. >> >> Regards >> -- >> -------------------- >> Saludos Cordiales >> >> Nhomar G. Hernandez M. >> +58-414-4110269 >> Skype: nhomar00 >> Web-Blog: http://geronimo.com.ve >> Servicios IT: http://vauxoo.com >> Linux-Counter: 467724 >> Correos: >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> twitter @nhomar >> > > > > -- > > > *camptocamp* > INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS > BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS > > *Joël Grand-Guillaume* > Division Manager > Business Solutions > > +41 21 619 10 28 > www.camptocamp.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
