> 3) i don't like this syntax. Is there a reason to do it? a good one? if no, i
> propose that you let it like that to keep the code as much consistent as
> possible.
> 75 - self.write(cr, uid, [o.id], {'invoice_ids': [(4, inv_id)]})
> 78 + o.write({'invoice_ids': [(4, inv_id)]})
as now we use attributes of self.pool.get() for browse_record too, thats quite
good, easy and consistent too (if we make practice of using that.)
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-bug-724131-rpa/+merge/82254
Your team OpenERP R&D Team is subscribed to branch
lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-bug-724131-rpa.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-dev-gtk
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-dev-gtk
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
