Indeed, there was quite a long thread about that in the offline discussions when we were looking at 2.0 .. I might still have that saved off somewhere, but it might take a while. In short, we wanted to have some commonality between parts to ensure that there was some semantic that bound these parts together which would prevent a free for all mash-up. I seem to recall that the stereo pipe was good test case for things like display window, time code, aspect ratio etc ... There was a desire to have a small enough set that could be potentially relaxes as time went on; going the other way is much more tricky.
Piotr On 6 April 2015 at 08:33, Karl Rasche <karlras...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone recall the motivation behind having common attributes shared > between parts in a multi-part file? > > It seems like the sort of thing that was debated and added for some good > reason.. > > Thanks > Karl > > > _______________________________________________ > Openexr-devel mailing list > Openexr-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
