Hello. On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 19:41, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:05:20 +0100 > Stefan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Is pxa-camera only builable as module or are there other reasons for not > > having > > it in the kernel? The kernel gets bigger with every new option, but I still > > find > > it useful to have all built in hardware supported with a monolitic kernel. > > For > > development that is at least. > > > > I think that to get pxa-camera builtin we need all v4l builtin, is that > what we want?
Hmm, indeed a good point. For sure we don't want to have all kind of subsystems compiled in. > Btw, for development I found very handy to have mt9m111 built as a > module, a round of rmmod/insmod is way faster than a kernel reload. The > day we'll consider openezx stable we could get again on this topic and > take a decision, for now I like a little bit of looseness :) Yeah, just leave it as it. regards Stefan Schmidt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
