Hi Dan, The information of our switch ASIC: PCI unit 0: Dev 0xb538, Rev 0x11, Chip BCM56538_B0, Driver BCM56634_B0 It seems our chip is older than yours (BCM56538 < BCM56634) May be it is the reason ? Thanks Nam ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Talayco" <dtala...@stanford.edu> > To: "NGUYEN Xuan Nam" <xuan-nam.ngu...@inria.fr> > Cc: "Dan Talayco at gmail" <dan.tala...@gmail.com>, "Damien Saucez" > <damien.sau...@inria.fr>, openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 6:44:18 PM > Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Pronto 3290 max flow entries ? > Glad to hear that part worked anyway. > The information we need is about the actual Broadcom ASIC inside the > box. If this information appears, it will be very late in the output > during initialization. > If you do 'cd /local/logs' and do 'less ofswd.log' you should see a > line like: > PCI unit 0: Dev 0xb634, Rev 0x11, Chip BCM56634_B0, Driver BCM56634_B0 > towards the top. > -Dan > On Friday, May 4, 2012 at 12:44 AM, NGUYEN Xuan Nam wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > I change the host parameter as you suggested and it works !!! > > Back to first question about max flow entries, > > I ran the test below and used the Web UI to see the number of flow > > entries : > > + FillTableExact : 1920 (flow entries) > > + FillTableWc : 1919 (flow entries) > > Here is the HW information about our Pronto switch 3290 > > CPU: 8541, Version: 1.1, (0x80720011) > > Core: E500, Version: 2.0, (0x80200020) > > Clock Configuration: > > CPU: 825 MHz, CCB: 330 MHz, > > DDR: 165 MHz, LBC: 41 MHz > > L1: D-cache 32 kB enabled > > I-cache 32 kB enabled > > I2C: ready > > DRAM: Initializing > > DDR: 512 MB > > FLASH: 32 MB > > L2 cache 256KB: enabled > > Set ethaddr MAC address = e8:9a:8f:fb:c3:fc > > Set eth1addr MAC address = e8:9a:8f:fb:c3:fd > > In: serial > > Out: serial > > Err: serial > > Net: TSEC0, TSEC1 > > IDE: Bus 0: OK > > Device 0: Model: 2GB CompactFlash Card Firm: CF B612D Ser#: > > C321102416A10v4B618j > > Type: Hard Disk > > Capacity: 1953.9 MB = 1.9 GB (4001760 x 512) > > Could you compare with your switch ? Thanks > > Nam > > On 05/03/2012 05:57 PM, Dan Talayco at gmail wrote: > > > Oops, wait. I misread the subject. > > > If you are trying to connect to a 3290, you can't specify > > > --host=127.0.0.1 (that would be trying to connect to a vswitch > > > running > > > on the local host. > > > Assuming you're talking to the 3290 over an interface with the IP > > > address 192.168.1.1(for example) you would use that: > > > sudo ./oft --host=192.168.1.1 --port=6634 --verbose > > > --test-spec=Echo > > > --platform=remote > > > The remote platform doesn't really matter if you're not using data > > > plane tests. Again, this assumes your 3290 is trying to talk to a > > > controller at 192.168.1.1 at port 6634. Note that no other > > > controller > > > should be running on the same host. > > > -Dan > > _______________________________________________ > > openflow-discuss mailing list > > openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
_______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
