Thanks Murphy, one of my students working with POX wants to give a try and hopefullly contribute to these efforts, can you share the pointers to that POX branch. We can only say positive things about prototypiing with POX -- giving it clean and effective OF1.3 support would be a neat upgrade beneficial to all parties :)
-Christian > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Congratulations. >> >> There's now POX branch that's been quickly hacked up to (sort of) use >> libfluid's Python bindings. It also includes a minor patch for one of the >> swig .i files. >> >> -- Murphy >> >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Christian Esteve Rothenberg >> <chest...@dca.fee.unicamp.br> wrote: >> >> Dear OpenFlow fellows, >> >> in case you are not aware about the public release of the winner >> implementation of the OpenFlow driver competition >> (https://www.opennetworking.org/competition) here is the pointer to the >> github repository: >> >> http://opennetworkingfoundation.github.io/libfluid/ >> >> libluid may be interesting to developers of both OpenFlow switches and >> controllers. It features support of OpenFlow 1.0 and 1.3, high performance, >> bindings to Python and Java, easy port to different hardware architectures, >> etc. >> >> We welcome users and developers interested in building an open community to >> maintain libfluid as a useful, multi-purpose OpenFlow library to develop >> switch agents and controller implementations. >> >> -Christian (on behalf of the libfluid team) >> _______________________________________________ >> openflow-discuss mailing list >> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss >> >> -- >> Christian -- Christia _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
