Hi Carlos, what do you mean with simpler? simpler compared to exactly which approach?
Thx, Christian On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Carlos Ferreira <carlosmf...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm actually working on a Controller/Driver implemented in Java. Still, > implementing C extensions for Python, in my opinion, is a simpler approach. > > > On 9 April 2014 03:49, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sure, it's just the libfluid_experiment branch of the main fork: >> http://noxrepo.org/git/pox/tree/libfluid_experiment >> >> It's definitely very much an experiment. ;) For starters, I was only >> messing with 1.0 and while I used libfluid to read off the wire, the >> responses are still generated with POX's OpenFlow library. I just thought >> it was worth experimenting to get a sense of what would be involved. If you >> guys are interested in doing much more work on this, we should talk! >> >> -- Murphy >> >> On Apr 8, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Christian Esteve Rothenberg >> <chest...@dca.fee.unicamp.br> wrote: >> >> Thanks Murphy, >> >> one of my students working with POX wants to give a try and hopefullly >> contribute to these efforts, can you share the pointers to that POX >> branch. We can only say positive things about prototypiing with POX -- >> giving it clean and effective OF1.3 support would be a neat upgrade >> beneficial to all parties :) >> >> -Christian >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Murphy McCauley >> <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Congratulations. >> >> There's now POX branch that's been quickly hacked up to (sort of) use >> libfluid's Python bindings. It also includes a minor patch for one of the >> swig .i files. >> >> -- Murphy >> >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Christian Esteve Rothenberg >> <chest...@dca.fee.unicamp.br> wrote: >> >> Dear OpenFlow fellows, >> >> in case you are not aware about the public release of the winner >> implementation of the OpenFlow driver competition >> (https://www.opennetworking.org/competition) here is the pointer to the >> github repository: >> >> http://opennetworkingfoundation.github.io/libfluid/ >> >> libluid may be interesting to developers of both OpenFlow switches and >> controllers. It features support of OpenFlow 1.0 and 1.3, high performance, >> bindings to Python and Java, easy port to different hardware architectures, >> etc. >> >> We welcome users and developers interested in building an open community >> to maintain libfluid as a useful, multi-purpose OpenFlow library to develop >> switch agents and controller implementations. >> >> -Christian (on behalf of the libfluid team) >> _______________________________________________ >> openflow-discuss mailing list >> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss >> >> -- >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Christia >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openflow-discuss mailing list >> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss >> > > > > -- > > Carlos Miguel Ferreira > Researcher at Telecommunications Institute > Aveiro - Portugal > Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt > Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com > LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira -- Christian _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
