Hi Abhijit,
I thought I get an answer from NIC and DIDM guys, but in this case, I would propose we just make the on/off flag in beryllium SR3 and this solution we merge only into master M3 as we agreed with Luiz. Jozef ________________________________ From: Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 9:20 PM To: Subhash Singh Cc: Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); Abhijit Kumbhare; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features Hi Jozef, Will you be putting https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 into stable/beryllium after sometime has passed or do you think its better to avoid it altogether in stable/beryllium? Thanks, Abhijit On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Subhash Singh <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +[Anandhi] -- Regards, Subhash Kumar Singh On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi everyone, mainly guys from NIC and DIDM, I would ask you if you can read and talk about the bug 5464 table features https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464 There are two proposals, first (berylium SR2) that we merge the skip flag, which is I would say some "workaround" and set the flag to TRUE so we default skip the table features https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36506/ and second (boron M3) this solution of the problem which would lead to changes into your projects https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 We would much appreciate you answers Jozef _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
