On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> wrote:
> This change was due to the major performance hit on OVS 2.4 - and I > believe was a decision at one of the meetings. Reason: the inefficient > table features fetch were always causing a significant performance drop > regardless of whether DIDM or any other features needing table features > were enabled or not. If I remember right - the decision was to turn off the > table features on stable/beryllium & add the riskier fix on the master > first & then maybe port it to the stable/beryllium after some time it has > been baked in (may be in the next SR). > > So it would be better to release note it I think. > Yes, so lets do it. > > Do you have a short 3-4 line description Jozef for release note > (explaining why it was changed)? > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Personally i want it to be disabled by default, but if i look at it from >> user perspective, we are changing the behaviour between two SR version and >> it might be of some concern. But if this change is for lithium plugin, i >> think the impact is minimal, so i think if we can release note it, that >> would be better. >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON >> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You propose to leave the flag (skip table features) false ? Just not to >>> change default behavior? >>> >>> >>> Jozef >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Monday, May 9, 2016 7:21 PM >>> *To:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) >>> *Cc:* Abhijit Kumbhare; [email protected]; Abhijit Kumbhare; >>> Subhash Singh; [email protected]; Luis Gomez >>> Palacios >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features >>> >>> okay, although it's been done for li plugin, but i think it will change >>> the default behavior between two SR (SR2 and SR-3). >>> >>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON >>> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Nope, in stable/beryllium we add just this on/off flag, with default >>>> setting on OFF table features. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36506/3 >>>> >>>> >>>> Jozef >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Monday, May 9, 2016 10:37 AM >>>> *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare >>>> *Cc:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); >>>> [email protected]; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh; >>>> [email protected]; Luis Gomez Palacios >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features >>>> >>>> was this patch merged to stable/beryllium as well? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - >>>>> PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Abhijit, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought I get an answer from NIC and DIDM guys, but in this case, I >>>>>> would propose we just make the on/off flag in beryllium SR3 and this >>>>>> solution we merge only into master M3 as we agreed with Luiz. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jozef >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From:* Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2016 9:20 PM >>>>>> *To:* Subhash Singh >>>>>> *Cc:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); >>>>>> Abhijit Kumbhare; [email protected]; >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jozef, >>>>>> >>>>>> Will you be putting https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 >>>>>> into stable/beryllium after sometime has passed or do you think its >>>>>> better >>>>>> to avoid it altogether in stable/beryllium? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Abhijit >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Subhash Singh < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +[Anandhi] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Subhash Kumar Singh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - >>>>>>> PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, mainly guys from NIC and DIDM, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would ask you if you can read and talk about the bug 5464 table >>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are two proposals, first (berylium SR2) that we merge the >>>>>>>> skip flag, which is I would say some "workaround" and set the flag to >>>>>>>> TRUE >>>>>>>> so we default skip the table features >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36506/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and second (boron M3) this solution of the problem which would >>>>>>>> lead to changes into your projects >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We would much appreciate you answers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jozef >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> openflowplugin-dev mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> openflowplugin-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks >>>> Anil >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks >>> Anil >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> Anil >> > > -- Thanks Anil
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
