Great - thanks Shuva!

On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry for crashing all the builds yesterday.
>
> I have coded another fix for the same:
>
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45125/
>
> It passes all the tests that it should , and does not introduce any
> additional failures.
>
> Results on stable/Bo : https://jenkins.opendaylight.
> org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-boron/37/
> Results on Carbon: https://jenkins.opendaylight.
> org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-carbon/11/
>
>
> @Venkat/Hideyuki - Request you to please test it out with this patch to
> see if it alleviates vtn issues
>
> Please feel free to ping me
>
> Thanks
> Shuva
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 4:20 PM
> To: 'Tai, Hideyuki'; Luis Gomez
> Cc: [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
>
> Thanks Luis and Hideyuki for the analysis.
>
> I have out in a fix to address the issue of the post status getting
> updated prior to mastership of the switch gets determined
>
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45049/
>
> Do test it with the latest build and let us know
>
> Thanks
> Shuva
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tai, Hideyuki [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 7:58 AM
> To: Luis Gomez; Shuva Jyoti Kar
> Cc: [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
>
> Hi Luis,
>
> Thank you for sharing the great information.
>
> The information matches with my investigation.
>
> I've written the outcome of my investigation so far into the bug report.
> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595#c2
>
> I think the OpenFlow plugin failed to process port status message, because
> it failed to get a WriteTransaction.
> And, the OpenFlow plugin failed to get the WriteTransaction, because it
> was before it started the service as MASTER for the siwtch.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideyuki Tai
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] <
> [email protected]> on behalf of Luis
> Gomez <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:17 PM
> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
>
> In the case of cluster the port status ERROR seem to happen just after a
> member becomes SLAVE for a device:
>
> https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-
> clustering-only-boron/606/archives/odl3_karaf.log.gz
>
> While in VTN Manger the issue seems to happen because of longer Master
> selection the first time switch connects to controller:
>
> 2016-08-31 23:18:01,788 | INFO  | entLoopGroup-5-2 |
> ConnectionAdapterImpl            | 173 - 
> org.opendaylight.openflowjava.openflow-protocol-impl
> - 0.8.0.Boron-RC2 | Hello received / branch
> 2016-08-31 23:18:02,428 | WARN  | entLoopGroup-5-3 | DeviceContextImpl
>             | 183 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl -
> 0.3.0.Boron-RC2 | Error processing port status message:
> 2016-08-31 23:18:02,553 | INFO  | lt-dispatcher-20 | LifecycleServiceImpl
>            | 183 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl - 0.3.0.Boron-RC2
> | ========== Start-up clustering MASTER services for node openflow:1 was
> SUCCESSFUL ==========
>
> In successive switch connections the Master resolution is very fast:
>
> 2016-08-31 23:27:28,551 | INFO  | entLoopGroup-5-6 |
> ConnectionAdapterImpl            | 173 - 
> org.opendaylight.openflowjava.openflow-protocol-impl
> - 0.8.0.Boron-RC2 | Hello received / branch
> 2016-08-31 23:27:28,582 | INFO  | lt-dispatcher-21 | LifecycleServiceImpl
>            | 183 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl - 0.3.0.Boron-RC2
> | ========== Start-up clustering MASTER services for node openflow:1 was
> SUCCESSFUL ==========
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, will do that today.
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 1, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Luis/Venkat,
> >>
> >> Have pushed a gerrit get more information on the port whose status is
> being missed:
> >> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45024/
> >>
> >> Please try it out with this and share the logs to analyse the failure
> to process the port status message.
> >> We need to establish that the tx chain is activated while we are
> >> trying to update the port status
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >> From: Luis Gomez [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 2:40 PM
> >> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> >> Cc: Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech; Andrej Leitner;
> >> [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> FYI the "Error processing port status message" is not seen very often
> in openflow test suites for 1 node but it is very present in 3 node cluster
> test:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3
> >> node-clustering-only-boron/604/archives/odl1_karaf.log.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> BR/Luis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 1, 2016, at 1:21 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Venkat,
> >>
> >> I see add flow failing with "Device reported error type BADACTION code
> BADSETARGUMENT", "Device disconnected" and 
> "java.util.concurrent.CancellationException:
> Task was cancelled" , which are genuine.
> >> Do we know what is the flow that is being  rejected as a BADACTION , or
> why is there a flow push when the device is disconnected or why was the
> task cancelled ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >> From: Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 1:14 PM
> >> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar; Luis Gomez; Andrej Leitner
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> Shuva,
> >>     It fails very frequently since 23rd this month. Every time it fails
> all the ping tests in OF10 fail, which makes it unusable for Openflow 1.0.
> >> Ref:
> >> https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/vtn-csit-1node-coordi
> >> nator-only-boron/195/archives/karaf.log.gz
> >>
> >> Remove Flows RPC has resulted in a failure, Add Flow has resulted in a
> failure,  Statistics has resulted in a failure, Due to these failures the
> flow entries were not installed.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Venkat G
> >>
> >> From: Shuva Jyoti Kar [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:31 PM
> >> To: Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech <[email protected]>; Luis
> >> Gomez <[email protected]>; Andrej Leitner
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> Venkat,
> >>
> >> Could you please explain your last statement? Does it fail sporadically
> or consistently ?
> >>
> >> Also the statement for bug 6595 states "The latest regression runs
> >> for VTN CSIT jobs reports failure in normal flow installation when
> testing with OF 1.0 switches"
> >> Is that correct since the flow installation fails genuinely because of
> errors.
> >>
> >> Please let us know
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >> From: Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 11:57 AM
> >> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar; Luis Gomez; Andrej Leitner
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> Shuva,
> >>
> >> We also see that the Port Statistics RPC has failed, which results in
> VTN concluding that ports are DOWN. VTN is a reactive implementation, hence
> VTN does not install entries considering the egress port is DOWN.
> >> The tests are not failing in every run, but every time it fails, OF1.0
> failures are observed.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Venkat G
> >>
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> >> Of Shuva Jyoti Kar
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:18 PM
> >> To: Luis Gomez <[email protected]>; Andrej Leitner
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> Yes, but if I drill into the logs
> >>
> >> 1)      https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/vtn-csit-
> 1node-coordinator-only-boron/209/archives/karaf.log.gz
> >> a.       errors=Device disconnected (3times)
> >> 2)      https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/vtn-csit-
> 1node-manager-only-boron/637/archives/karaf.log.gz
> >> a.       errors=Device reported error type BADACTION code
> BADSETARGUMENT(19 times)
> >> b.      errors=Device disconnected (10 times)
> >> c.       reason java.util.concurrent.CancellationException: Task was
> cancelled(5 times)
> >>
> >> If you search for SalFlowServiceImpl.
> >> We do have 0f1.0 TCs for flowprovisioning , are those passing ? If
> >> yes then probably , vtn might need to drill down further
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> >> Of Luis Gomez
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 11:35 AM
> >> To: Andrej Leitner
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> The bug 6654 is happening sporadically in our system test but you can
> reproduce it very quickly if you stop and start mininet with no delay for
> few times. Thats what I did to confirm the issue.
> >>
> >> The bug 6595 is blocker because VTN has a regression in its OF10 system
> test using the new plugin. BTW I also see this exception very often in the
> openflow system test so it would be good to fix it for the Boron release.
> >>
> >> BR/Luis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Aug 31, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Andrej Leitner
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I assume 6554 is not fixed yet. I've tried to get into it, but was
> unable to reproduce it locally. Today is public holiday on Slovakia so will
> continue on Friday. I don't know 6595, must be something new.
> >> From: Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:09:54 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [openflowplugin-dev] Blocking bugs
> >>
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> We seem to have two blocking bugs - that we should discuss tomorrow if
> not fixed already:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554
> >>
> >> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Abhijit
> >> AndrejLeitner
> >> Software Developer
> >>
> >> Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia R&D centrum /
> >> Janka Kráľa 9 /  974 01 Banská Bystrica / Slovakia /
> >> [email protected]
> >> reception: +421 2 206 65 114 / www.pantheon.sk
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ::DISCLAIMER::
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are
> >> confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
> >> E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
> >> information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
> >> late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail
> and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not
> attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates.
> >> Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those
> >> of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions
> >> of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination,
> >> copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
> this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative
> of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error
> please delete it and notify the sender immediately.
> >> Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for
> viruses and other defects.
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----------
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
> _______________________________________________
> openflowplugin-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to