About the first one - https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575:
Tomas has said in yesterday's meeting that this was dependent on https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6710. And that it was fixed. Can we retest? Also a question for Tomas: 6710 is cluster related - while 6575 is not clear if it is cluster or single node. Are we sure 6575 is fixed? The second one: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917 - Shuva will respond about that some time. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are getting close to Boron SR1 so I think it makes sense to review the > 2 blocking issues we have: > > > 1) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575 > > Summary: > > l2switch does not work well when mininet is disconnected and connected > with no time in-between. > > Description: > > This is kind of old issue, since the He->Li migration the l2switch has > experienced random issues in the system test: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/ > l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-boron/ > > Same test passes fine in Beryllium as you can see below: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/ > l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-beryllium/ > > The last discovery (just before Boron release) was that giving more time > between stop mininet and start mininet made the suite pass. > > Criticality: > > Although this was a clear regression in l2switch test (Be->B), this bug > was not initially marked as blocker because it was not trivial to reproduce > (e.g. switch connection flap). > > Risk of not fixing: > > l2switch and other similar applications relying on ofplugin may not work > well when switch connection flaps. > > > 2) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917 > > Summary: > > Flow matching function (operational flow reconciliation) is not stable. > > Description: > > I discovered this issue doing some random flow push test in my laptop > using POSTMAN: adding and deleting the same flow few times produced an > alien ID in the operational flow. > After that I have created a test that does exactly that: add flow, verify > operational ID, delete flow, sleep 5s, repeat. With these simple steps the > issue shows consistently for Boron (new test): > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node- > flow-services-only-boron/758/archives/log.html.gz > > But not in Beryllium: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node- > flow-services-only-beryllium/1854/archives/log.html.gz > > Criticality: > > Besides the test regression, I think there are applications in ODL relying > on operational flow ID that would be negatively impacted by this bug. > > Risk of not fixing: > > OF applications relying on operational flow ID (e.g. to confirm flows) can > sporadically fail. > > > _______________________________________________ > L2switch-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
