Yes - I agree with Colin. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've commented on the relevant patch, but I'll also say it here. It's > really not clear to me that this will reduce confusion. My guess is that > changing the name we've used for 5 releases will cause at least as much > confusion as renaming it fixes. > > --Colin > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Jozef Bacigál <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> the “*topology_id*” in openflow-plugin is defined as * “flow:1”* which >> can lead to confusion if you look at the topology tree. >> >> >> >> I’ve changed to topology id setting into yang configuration file and set >> the default value as *“openflow”* which is more describing. >> >> >> >> If someone project using in *rest calls hard written with “/flow:1/”* as >> topology id *those links will be broken*. >> >> >> >> This change is mentioned to be merged *only into master (Carbon)* branch. >> >> >> >> Patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/48108/ >> >> Weather: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Change_of_topolog >> y_id_in_openflow-plugin >> >> >> >> Jozef >> >> >> >> JozefBacigál >> >> Software Engineer >> >> >> Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia >> R&D centrum / Janka Kráľa 9 / 974 01 Banská Bystrica / Slovakia >> +421 908 766 972 / [email protected] >> reception: +421 2 206 65 114 / www.pantheon.sk >> >> [image: logo] >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openflowplugin-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > release mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
