On 11/10/2016 06:44 PM, Colin Dixon wrote: > I think flow:1 is hard code a lot of places even inside OpenDaylight...
That is a *really* bad idea. This is equivalent of assuming a particular implementation of an interface. Whoever is using this hard-coded value should be getting a reference to a topology instead (and check whether the injected topology conforms to expectations by advertising a topology-type). Bye, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
