Something something. Reality vs. practice. Something something. More seriously, if we have a suggested best practice to avoid hard coding this in and then can search through all the projects and help them move away from it, I'm sure that would be appreciated by lots of people.
--Colin On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/10/2016 06:44 PM, Colin Dixon wrote: > > I think flow:1 is hard code a lot of places even inside OpenDaylight... > > That is a *really* bad idea. This is equivalent of assuming a particular > implementation of an interface. > > Whoever is using this hard-coded value should be getting a reference to > a topology instead (and check whether the injected topology conforms to > expectations by advertising a topology-type). > > Bye, > Robert > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
