Just remind this issue is not really critical but it is set as blocker because there is a change of behavior (small regression) from Beryllium to Boron. From this perspective I think it is OK to defer the fix for this to SR3 if both projects agree on that.
BR/Luis > On Dec 8, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sai, > > Can we target this for Boron SR3 ? > > Thanks > Shuva > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sai > MarapaReddy > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 2:33 AM > To: An Ho > Cc: [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] openflowplugin blocker bug > > Hi An, > > I didn't get time to work on the bug. I request to carry forward it to SR3. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:49 AM, An Ho <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi L2SWITCH and OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, > > We would like to kindly request an update on this OPENFLOWPLUGIN/L2SWITCH > Boron Blocker Bug? Please let us know the ETA for a fix or if we should > retarget the blocker bug for Boron-SR3 instead. > > Bug 6575 - l2switch does not work well when mininet is disconnected and > connected with no time in-between > > Best Regards, > An Ho > > _______________________________________________ > L2switch-dev mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/l2switch-dev>
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
