Thanks Luis. On Monday, December 12, 2016, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, I guess this is kind of similar to bug 6575, it is blocker because > this is a regression from Beryllium release (old plugin). But the issue > (report alien ID instead of normal ID in operational) does not impact > dataplane forwarding + it does not happen with all flows (it took me some > time to write the automation to reproduce it), so I believe we can lower > down the priority to CRITICAL and target it for Boron SR3 if nobody has > objections. > > BR/Luis > > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 6:35 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > About https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917 - I understand > the following: > > The fix for this was https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47138/ > (master) and https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47320 (stable/boron). > The fix caused more issues & instabilities which was a blocker. That fix > has been taken out by Jozef - which leaved 6917. However that is not a > blocker. Luis should confirm and reduce the priority of 6917. > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> If I am not mistaken - I think Anil had backed out the following change: >> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917. Not sure if it got >> merged Anil? >> >> About https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 - added Alon >> (as he has raised the priority to blocker yesterday). >> >> Alon - would like to check with you if you think it is OK to defer this >> bug (6908) to the next SR since we need to get this SR out and the >> investigation/fix by Shuva/Jozef may need a few days? >> >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:20 PM, An Ho <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, >>> >>> We would like to kindly request an update on these OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron >>> Blocker Bugs? Please let us know the ETA for a fix or if we should >>> retarget the blocker bug for Boron-SR3 instead. >>> >>> Bug 6908 - failed to update port status - all new OVS ports fail from >>> this point. Is this only for Carbon or does it apply to Boron-SR2 as >>> well? Otherwise, we should retarget for Carbon. >>> Bug 6917 - Flow matching function (operational flow reconciliation) is >>> not stable. Luis reopened this bug on 12/08. Are there plans to fix it >>> now, or can we retarget for Boron-SR3 for more time? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> An Ho >>> >>> [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 >>> [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7343 >>> >>> >> > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
