Yes, that's correct. Controller that establishes the connection first with the switch gets the ownership. Currently the default ownership strategy is first come first get, so this kind of distribution you see is very much possible.
________________________________ From: Sam Hague <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:38 AM To: Sela, Guy; Anil Vishnoi Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Aizer, Koby; Pearl, Tomer Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Problems with load-balancing of OVSs in a cluster? Adding Anil since I asked him about this last week. I think the default behavior for ownership is simply which ODL receives the incoming connection first becomes the owner. I might have that confused with the ovsdb side though. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Sela, Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I have a 3-node cluster which I connect 200 OVSs to. Each OVS is configured with all the 3 ODLs as managers. When checking which ODL took ownership on which OVS, I expected something equally distributed but got: ODL 1: 14 switches ODL 2: 46 switches ODL 3: 140 switches Is this normal? Thanks, Guy Sela _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opendaylight.org_mailman_listinfo_openflowplugin-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=nNx-ccom3k8BhfkcqdGNBnq-5rteGW1CENWnxJvQP1M&m=1kdmGwAKdBurpjfxKYg4JITFZ_icWVWV0GUnPgkZsfw&s=kUkCp714exkaPCTH4l-m3hZTzXJclEOiZ1Tn5OJgZ84&e=>
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
