Hi, Hi,
So who might know if I can use a load-balancer strategy? From: Anil Vishnoi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:20 AM To: Pearl, Tomer <[email protected]> Cc: Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]>; Sam Hague <[email protected]>; Sela, Guy <[email protected]>; Aizer, Koby <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [ovsdb-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Problems with load-balancing of OVSs in a cluster? I believe there is load balancer strategy is implemented but not sure if EOS is really using it. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Pearl, Tomer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Are there any other strategies already implemented / will be implemented in carbon? If there are, how can we activate them? From: Anil Vishnoi [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 9:05 AM To: Sam Hague <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Sela, Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Aizer, Koby <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Pearl, Tomer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Problems with load-balancing of OVSs in a cluster? Yes, that's correct. Controller that establishes the connection first with the switch gets the ownership. Currently the default ownership strategy is first come first get, so this kind of distribution you see is very much possible. ________________________________ From: Sam Hague <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:38 AM To: Sela, Guy; Anil Vishnoi Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Aizer, Koby; Pearl, Tomer Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Problems with load-balancing of OVSs in a cluster? Adding Anil since I asked him about this last week. I think the default behavior for ownership is simply which ODL receives the incoming connection first becomes the owner. I might have that confused with the ovsdb side though. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Sela, Guy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I have a 3-node cluster which I connect 200 OVSs to. Each OVS is configured with all the 3 ODLs as managers. When checking which ODL took ownership on which OVS, I expected something equally distributed but got: ODL 1: 14 switches ODL 2: 46 switches ODL 3: 140 switches Is this normal? Thanks, Guy Sela _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opendaylight.org_mailman_listinfo_openflowplugin-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=nNx-ccom3k8BhfkcqdGNBnq-5rteGW1CENWnxJvQP1M&m=1kdmGwAKdBurpjfxKYg4JITFZ_icWVWV0GUnPgkZsfw&s=kUkCp714exkaPCTH4l-m3hZTzXJclEOiZ1Tn5OJgZ84&e=> _______________________________________________ ovsdb-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/ovsdb-dev -- Thanks Anil
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
