On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Michael Vorburger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Sunil Kumar G < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> We are considering to implement bundle based reconciliation approach as >> an alternate to existing reconciliation. >> >> We will provide configuration knob to select the existing approach or >> bundle based, by default value will be set(false) to opt the existing >> approach, which remains as it is. >> >> User can set configuration to true to enable bundle based reconciliation. >> > > This would be useful notably for hitless switch re-synchronization for > upgrade-ability. > > Would you perhaps like to create a new Bugzilla issue so that all work > related to this can be tracked, and respective changes related to this goal > prefixed with the respective "Bug 123: " prefix? (Unless there already is a > Bugzilla for this overall topic?) > +1. Sunil, please open a bug and also provide some high level implementation details in the bug. > > Tx, > M. > -- > Michael Vorburger, Red Hat > [email protected] | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch > > > >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Sunil >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > -- Thanks Anil
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
