Hi OpenFlow Plugin committers, Do you have any objections to putting the LLDP code currently in the controller project into OpenFlow Plugin. Anil and I have voiced opinion that it is OK to add it to OpenFlow Plugin. If no valid objection comes up till Monday - we can consider it as a go ahead.
Abhijit ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Colin Dixon <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:02 PM Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] liblldp project proposal To: Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>, Sam Hague <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < [email protected]> It just seems easier to me to put the code in OpenFlow plugin than to pull a new project out of a hat that somehow doesn't behave like normal projects. If we can move it to OpenFlow plugin for now, that seems right. --Colin On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> wrote: > As a openflow committer hat on, I also don't have any strong objection > here. > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I believe it was more of a library that could be used by any project for >> LLDP protocol packets - even though it's currently used only by OpenFlow >> Plugin. Hence we thought a central place would be better. Otherwise I don't >> see much problem in putting it into OpenFlow Plugin. >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM Colin Dixon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm happy either way. The fact that lldp "is a protocol" doesn't seem >>> like a compelling argument for why it can't go in the OpenFlow plugin >>> project to me, but maybe I'm missing something. >>> >>> Abhijit, is there something I'm missing for why it shouldn't go in >>> OpenFlow plugin? >>> >>> --Colin >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:08 PM Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks! I take it the conclusion was that this shouldn't be part of >>>>> the OpenFlow plugin project? >>>>> >>>> The discussion leaned to a new project. I think moving to >>>> openflowplugin would be easiest, but lldp is a protocol and doesn't make >>>> sense to be there. >>>> >>>> --Colin >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:57 AM Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello TSC, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have included the liblldp to the list of project proposals. I would >>>>>> like to start the two week discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> This proposal is contingent on the plan to spin out the liblldp >>>>>> project from the controller. The goal was to get this started so we can >>>>>> get >>>>>> this started if we wanted it in for the nitrogen release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Sam >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Liblldp >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> project-proposals mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals >>>>>> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> project-proposals mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals >> >> > > > -- > Thanks > Anil >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
