Please go ahead Br,shuva
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi OpenFlow Plugin committers, > > Do you have any objections to putting the LLDP code currently in the > controller project into OpenFlow Plugin. Anil and I have voiced opinion > that it is OK to add it to OpenFlow Plugin. If no valid objection comes up > till Monday - we can consider it as a go ahead. > > Abhijit > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Colin Dixon <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Project-proposals] liblldp project proposal > To: Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> > Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>, Sam Hague <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <project-proposals@lists. > opendaylight.org> > > > It just seems easier to me to put the code in OpenFlow plugin than to pull > a new project out of a hat that somehow doesn't behave like normal > projects. If we can move it to OpenFlow plugin for now, that seems right. > > --Colin > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> As a openflow committer hat on, I also don't have any strong objection >> here. >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I believe it was more of a library that could be used by any project for >>> LLDP protocol packets - even though it's currently used only by OpenFlow >>> Plugin. Hence we thought a central place would be better. Otherwise I don't >>> see much problem in putting it into OpenFlow Plugin. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM Colin Dixon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm happy either way. The fact that lldp "is a protocol" doesn't seem >>>> like a compelling argument for why it can't go in the OpenFlow plugin >>>> project to me, but maybe I'm missing something. >>>> >>>> Abhijit, is there something I'm missing for why it shouldn't go in >>>> OpenFlow plugin? >>>> >>>> --Colin >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:08 PM Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Colin Dixon <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! I take it the conclusion was that this shouldn't be part of >>>>>> the OpenFlow plugin project? >>>>>> >>>>> The discussion leaned to a new project. I think moving to >>>>> openflowplugin would be easiest, but lldp is a protocol and doesn't make >>>>> sense to be there. >>>>> >>>>> --Colin >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:57 AM Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello TSC, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have included the liblldp to the list of project proposals. I >>>>>>> would like to start the two week discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This proposal is contingent on the plan to spin out the liblldp >>>>>>> project from the controller. The goal was to get this started so we can >>>>>>> get >>>>>>> this started if we wanted it in for the nitrogen release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, Sam >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Liblldp >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> project-proposals mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> project-proposals mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/project-proposals >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> Anil >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
