Arun,
   It is not “installation by boot features property”, but it is “the features 
that are installed along with infrautils.ready”.
   If you even install manually the first feature that includes 
infrautils.ready, you will get system ready notification as expected. But if 
you install one more feature after a long gap, there won’t be any state change 
notification, it is still a work in progress.
Thanks,
Faseela

From: Michael Vorburger [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2017 4:42 PM
To: D Arunprakash <[email protected]>
Cc: Muthukumaran K <[email protected]>; Faseela K 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath 
<[email protected]>; Tom Pantelis <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Proposing infrautils.ready integration for 
openflowplugin

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:39 AM, D Arunprakash 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What will happen if we install features manually with some time delay between 
each others?
Like install Openflowplugin feature and give some time delay and then install 
the next features (may be an application)?

Will the notification be received twice?

No. infrautils.ready, on top of which infrautils.diagstatus is built, currently 
only serves the simple "installation by boot features property" approach. It 
basically does a polling of the OSGi APIs (using odlparent.bundlestest FYI), 
one time during start up.

In theory it would certainly be possible to extend infrautils.diagstatus => 
infrautils.ready and it's 
org.opendaylight.infrautils.ready.SystemReadyListener's onSystemBootReady() 
with an onSystemIsChanging() and onSystemReadyAgain(). But in the primary use 
case I have to support (downstream), "hot" installing additional ODL 
application features during operational uptime is not a real world requirement. 
If this is important to you, then your contributions for this would certainly 
be welcome.

Regards,
Arun

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Muthukumaran K
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 11:19 AM
To: Faseela K <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 Dayavanti Gopal Kamath 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
 Tom Pantelis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Proposing infrautils.ready integration for 
openflowplugin

Yes. That would be the right approach and can simplify the check by OFPlugin 
easier


Regards
Muthu


From: Faseela K
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 11:17 AM
To: Muthukumaran K; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 Sam Hague; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V; Tom Pantelis
Subject: RE: Proposing infrautils.ready integration for openflowplugin

Thanks for the input Muthu!
Diagstatus is already integrated to openflowplugin, and hence an additional 
check can be made to see whether DATASTORE service is operational when system 
is “ready”, before opening up the southbound interfaces.

Thanks,
Faseela

From: Muthukumaran K
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 11:15 AM
To: Faseela K <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 Sam Hague <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Dayavanti Gopal 
Kamath 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
 Vivek Srivastava V 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: Proposing infrautils.ready integration for openflowplugin

It would be cleaner to include the datastore check apart from just ready state.

When the application-features get installed, corresponding yang models are 
absorbed to build schema context incrementally. There is no absolute telling 
when this completes depending upon how quick application features get installed 
(Which in turn depend upon their dependency graph(s)). The schemacontext 
present at the time of restoration will be used as it is for validating and 
restoring data during scenarios like reboot.

Though most of the apps get installed as part of boot features, it would be 
better to include this exclusive check in addition to standard ready check

Hope we are all in sync

Regards
Muthu


From: Faseela K
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:46 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 Sam Hague; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath; Vivek Srivastava V; Muthukumaran K
Subject: Proposing infrautils.ready integration for openflowplugin

Hi Shuva/Arun
  As a follow up to diagstatus integration to openflowplugin, I would like to 
propose the integration of infrautils.ready for openflowplugin.
   This way openflowplugin can open the southbound ports after all bundles have 
come up properly.
   Also diagstatus can fetch the dynamic service status based on the current 
southbound connection status as well as other criteria.
   This will help in many cases, including initial system bring up as well as 
cluster reboot, as there is enough time for all applications to come up 
gracefully before they start receiving southbound events.
   Please let us know your thoughts on the same.
Thanks,
Faseela

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to