With the revert, CSITs are running fine for genius and netvirt.

Thanks,
Faseela

From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 8:47 PM
To: Faseela K <[email protected]>
Cc: Luis Gomez <[email protected]>; Release <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [release] [integration-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] IMPORTANT: Build 
breakage in openflowplugin due IP address NoZone changes

So I assume this topic is closed - and no need to have today's TWS session on 
this?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Faseela K 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
From the subsequent mails from Robert and Anil, there is a proposal that the 
change will be enhanced to fix equals() to be backward compatible. +1 to that.

Thanks,
Faseela

From: Abhijit Kumbhare 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 3:05 AM
To: Luis Gomez <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Faseela K <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Release 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [release] [integration-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] IMPORTANT: Build 
breakage in openflowplugin due IP address NoZone changes

+100. Couldn’t have said it better. Folks - please confirm the answers to 
Luis’s questions.

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 1:16 PM Luis Gomez 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I hope as a community we can learn some lessons from this breakage:

- Upstream projects: please do not push changes breaking or changing API 
behavior without notice or weather item. If the impact is unintentional please 
revert quick to minimize downtime and confusion.
- Downstream projects: please attend the TSC meetings (at least the Managed 
ones), so when a decision is made impacting you, you can agree or object but 
not complaint later.

Now that patch has been reverted and weather is in place:

- Is anybody still interested in driving this change?
- If so any objection from any downstream project?

BR/Luis


On Apr 22, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Faseela K 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Here are the revert patches in lispflowmapping and bgpcep.

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/71187/
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/71193/

However, FYI that Anil has removed his -1 on ofp patch, and a weather is 
already in place. Also genius and netvirt CSITs are passing with the ovsdb 
patch. In case we decide to merge those patches in, the above ones can be 
abandoned.


Thanks,
Faseela

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Tom Pantelis
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 4:37 AM
To: Sam Hague <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 Release <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [release] [openflowplugin-dev] IMPORTANT: Build breakage in 
openflowplugin due IP address NoZone changes



On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Sam Hague 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well, maybe we can keep the change.. I ran ovsdb [1] and netvirt csit [2] using 
the ovsdb patch Vishal had for the issue and they both look to have passed. 
NetVirt relies on ofp, ovsdb and genius so that seems to show things work. I 
ran this in the last couple hours using the ovsdb distro from yesterday which 
should have been before Tom reverted the patch. If someone could verify my 
comment that the artifacts used in the CSIT run truly do have the changes, then 
maybe we can keep this change.

That's good that it passed. But folks were asking to revert so that's what I 
did. If someone wants to "unrevert" it and drive that and ensure there's no 
other breakages, that's fine.



Thanks, Sam

[1] 
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/ovsdb-patch-test-core-fluorine/16/

[2] 
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-queens-gate-stateful-fluorine/236

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 7:13 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks Robert.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Robert Varga <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
On 21/04/18 01:49, Robert Varga wrote:
>> The weather process
>> needed to have been followed - with the possibility for downstream
>> projects to not accept the change for legitimate reasons. Please do so
>> in the future.
>>
>> The most ideal solution as suggested by Luis below & initially agreed by
>> Tom would have been to back out the change, discuss it completely (in a
>> the TWS call) and go ahead with the decision after the TWS call. As it
>> stands, and pointed by Tom, backing out the change looks to be a
>> daunting task. Since that is the case, let us do the following:
>> 0) Unblock the projects by whatever means - whether it is projects
>> merging the changes to accommodate the original patch or reverting
>> 1) Robert, please create the weather report with the existing change
> Sorry for the delay, today has been exceptionally busy, I will file a
> weather item tomorrow.
>

https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-96

Regards,
Robert


_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev


_______________________________________________
release mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release

_______________________________________________
integration-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/integration-dev

_______________________________________________
release mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release

_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to