On 19/04/18 20:41, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > Robert & Tom, > > Regardless of the merits of this particular change, I agree with Vishal > & Luis that this is a failure of communication.
Yes, both Tom and I agree, this is something none of us realized and we have both agreed to improve our workflows to eliminate this sort of breakage sneaking it. > The weather process > needed to have been followed - with the possibility for downstream > projects to not accept the change for legitimate reasons. Please do so > in the future. > > The most ideal solution as suggested by Luis below & initially agreed by > Tom would have been to back out the change, discuss it completely (in a > the TWS call) and go ahead with the decision after the TWS call. As it > stands, and pointed by Tom, backing out the change looks to be a > daunting task. Since that is the case, let us do the following: > 0) Unblock the projects by whatever means - whether it is projects > merging the changes to accommodate the original patch or reverting > 1) Robert, please create the weather report with the existing change Sorry for the delay, today has been exceptionally busy, I will file a weather item tomorrow. > 2) in the meantime people can chime in on the thread and try to resolve it > 3) we WILL continue the discussion on the Monday TWS if this is not > resolved by Monday. Casey has this meeting scheduled in any case. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
