Le dimanche 20 janvier 2008 à 02:05 +0100, Dave Crossland a écrit : > On 20/01/2008, minombresbond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i visited the unifont site, http://unifont.org/go_for_ofl/, and it seems > > that there is a consensus behind the OFL license > > Yes; If you succeed in convincing font developers who normally > distribute fonts with proprietary licenses to use the OFL, please do > post about it here :-) My personal part of the consensus is that a standard well-researched license like the OFL is better than the current alternatives. If there was a GPL-ish font license I'd push for it instead but the FSF didn't really bother with it so far and Red Hat Liberation licensing shows what a mess it can all become when projects try to adapt the GPL to a context it was not designed for (and RH is supposed to understand the GPL). -- Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ Openfontlibrary mailing list Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary
