Robert Martinez wrote:
really cool!
are other projects that might jump on the OFLB wagon before FF3.5 comes out?
might turn out to be cool for everyone!

i'd say we could pitch this to most designers who release freeware fonts. A lot of them will probably not care or be scared of the derivative works provision. However, some might look at it the right way if the arguments for open-ness are well-articulated enough.

which reminds me, it would be nice to have a document with a good set of arguments clearing out that the OFL doesn't mean people will be able to 'steal' your stuff any more than a proprietary license (it will actually make you more friends :)

if anyone's also up for it, i'd be interested in group-drafting a FAQ of sorts for designers who might be reluctant to step towards libre licensing of their work, clearing up common misunderstandings and allaying some fears they might have regarding that. And then we could get in touch with them, especially given that there's an expert PR person on the boat (go Dave :o)

out of my head, a few arguments:
* your work will be credited
* it would get much more visibility and respect than what the 'free font' websites give * anyone who would steal or hijack an open font would do the same if it was freeware (or even proprietary, given that you can find 90% of commercial fonts on p2p -- not a safe argument but still) * a good metaphor for being open is sharing your lunch and making friends, not opening your house to burglars (this one is *way* too common among designers, in my experience)
* and so on.

do you think building up this kind of traditional-designer-oriented argumentary makes sense?

quick list of designers that could later be approached:
* Jos Buivenga from exljbris (who releases some fonts as freeware as a marketing device for selling extended families)
* Manfred Klein
* Ray Larabie (the 'free font' legend, maybe he can be convinced to OFL some of his older creations?) * Ellen Lupton (not a type designer, but Nicolas's enlightenment on the legal issues could work for OFL PR :) * LettError (did some funky font experiments, again could be convinced to OFL some older stuff) * Hoefler and Frere-Jones (this could be a long shot, but they've built such a huge collection of work that their older stuff could also be opened up)
* House Industries (same as previous)
* Underware (even a longer shot, but who knows what experiments they might have hidden in their drawers)
* ....

i'll shut up for now. Again, most are long shots, but if even one designer would consider it, that would be good enough. I would emphasise that stepping towards the traditional type designer world would be, IMHO, a good if not necessary strategic move for the OFLB and OFL awareness in general.

do let me know if it all sounds silly :o)

Reply via email to