>> which reminds me, it would be nice to have a document with a good set of >> arguments clearing out that the OFL doesn't mean people will be able to >> 'steal' your stuff any more than a proprietary license (it will actually >> make you more friends :) > > As NS already mentioned, he and I and Ed (and others, I forget) worked > on a ODT/PDF "Go For OFL!" letter which got permission from various > orgs to use their logo to lend credibility to the letter. > >> if anyone's also up for it, i'd be interested in group-drafting a FAQ of >> sorts for designers who might be reluctant to step towards libre licensing >> of their work, clearing up common misunderstandings and allaying some fears >> they might have regarding that. > > Jump into the wiki :-)
OK, I put some notes I had lying around about this in our wiki: http://openfontlibrary.org/wiki/DesignersPerspectiveOpenFonts Food for thought and a basis for your advocacy resources to designers I hope :-) >> do you think building up this kind of traditional-designer-oriented >> argumentary makes sense? > > Totally :-) Cheers, -- Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary http://planet.open-fonts.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
