On Monday, 29 de November de 2010 09:08:27 Don Sanders wrote: > > If maintainers are selected on a merit basis and they have authority over > > the module / subsystem that they maintain, then it follows the grouping > > of maintainers has merit and authority over the entire project. Does > > this make sense? > > Yes. Personally I think that sounds reasonable.
Then the grouping of maintainers has the authority to make policy decisions --
technical decisions concerning the entirety of the project.
Now, a group to look after the community well-being, like the CWG from KDE
that Lydia represents, is still needed, but given the differences in size and
profile of community, I don't expect it to be needed right now. Something for a
group of people interested to think of starting on their own.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) nokia.com
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
Sandakerveien 116, NO-0402 Oslo, Norway
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opengov mailing list Opengov@qt-labs.org http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov
