On 11/26/2010 08:40 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Let's not have it if we don't have to. If and when we reach a point where > major technical decisions need deciding and we can't find a group of > maintainers skilled to make the decision, we'll revisit this idea.
OK. Agreed, since I wasn't really a fan of it either. I've commented out the section on the proposal wiki page. For now, I'd just say we go for maintainers+a consensus model, let's see how far common sense gets us? *IF* we get to a point where there is a lack of common sense, then well, perhaps we have other problems? :) > However, I actually like the idea of having people who look after the > community well-being. This has nothing to do with the technical Governance of > the project, though. KDE has the Community Working Group (CWG) and they're > not > technical. Unlike the TWG, the CWG is working just fine. I think that's a bit beyond the scope of this thread, but it is something to think about. -- Robin Burchell - http://rburchell.com Software Engineer, Collabora Ltd. - http://collabora.co.uk _______________________________________________ Opengov mailing list Opengov@qt-labs.org http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov
