Alvin Marcelo wrote:
> I agree with you in principle but it's the .com that seems to be against
> the grain of OSS. It might work against the
> idea. I know it's trivial but that's how I feel. A .org or .net would be
> better (if we can have it).
<SHRINK MODE>
and just how long has this been troubling you? do you have
feelings of anger when you see www.linux.com or www.redhat.com?
do you ever feel like hacking up the little SuSe lizard with an
axe?
</SHRINK MODE>
> Two, aside from a central index, we may also need a standard format for
> presentation of the specifics of a project so a potential user can, in a
> glance, determine the basic machinery of the project. An example of this
> would be (please feel free to add/delete/modify):
>
> Title: Project_title
> Hardware: PC, Mac
> OS: Linux
> Client: any OS running Netscape 3.x or higher, IE 3.x or higher, RealAudio
> plug-in
> Server: Apache, PHP, MySQL, PostgreSQL
> Info Model: GEHR
> Dbase: Relational
> Environment: Three MD primary practice
> Covers: Registration, Medication, Diagnosis, Procedures, etc
>
This looks good to me.
--------------------------------------
Tim Cook, Coordinator FreePM Project
http://www.freepm.org
Open Source for a Free World
---------------------------------------
