"John S. Gage" wrote:
> 
> 
> It definitely will be different every time.  I think the essential
> question is: model in XML or UML?  What are your ideas about the
> advisability of each (knowing in advance that you are modeling in
> Eiffel)?  The advantage of XML is that it is closely related to the
> concept of a document, which as Brian points out is very near and dear
> to medicine.
> 

XML is not really a modelling language.  So UML is the still king here. 
XML is one way to manipulate data objects defined in UML.

So I say full speed ahead with the modeling efforts that are already
underway.

-Brian

Reply via email to