"John S. Gage" wrote: > > > It definitely will be different every time. I think the essential > question is: model in XML or UML? What are your ideas about the > advisability of each (knowing in advance that you are modeling in > Eiffel)? The advantage of XML is that it is closely related to the > concept of a document, which as Brian points out is very near and dear > to medicine. > XML is not really a modelling language. So UML is the still king here. XML is one way to manipulate data objects defined in UML. So I say full speed ahead with the modeling efforts that are already underway. -Brian
- Re: Patient control Brian Bray
- Re: Patient control John S. Gage
- RE: Patient control Hemant Shah
- Re: Patient control Thomas Beale
- Re: Patient control John S. Gage
- Re: Patient control David Forslund
- Re: Patient control John S. Gage
- Re: Patient control David Forslund
- Re: Patient control Brian Bray
- Re: Patient control John S. Gage
- Re: Patient control Brian Bray
- Re: Patient control John S. Gage
- Re: Patient control Gregory Woodhouse
- Re: Patient control Mary Kratz
- Re: Patient control Alvin B. Marcelo
- Re: Patient control John S. Gage
- Re: Example of CORBA Rob Cecil
- Re: Example of CORBA David Forslund
- RE: Example of CORBA Eyestone, Scott M
- Re: Example of CORBA Gregory Woodhouse
