How do UML models describe themselves? Is there a concept of meta-data
in UML?
John
Brian Bray wrote:
>
> "John S. Gage" wrote:
> >
> >
> > It definitely will be different every time. I think the essential
> > question is: model in XML or UML? What are your ideas about the
> > advisability of each (knowing in advance that you are modeling in
> > Eiffel)? The advantage of XML is that it is closely related to the
> > concept of a document, which as Brian points out is very near and dear
> > to medicine.
> >
>
> XML is not really a modelling language. So UML is the still king here.
> XML is one way to manipulate data objects defined in UML.
>
> So I say full speed ahead with the modeling efforts that are already
> underway.
>
> -Brian
