I agree Tim - as per my reply to Andrew. I don't know of any reason that Python
could not be used but I will have to leave it to my more knowledgeable
colleagues to give a more informed opinion on this.
Regards
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: tim [mailto:tim] On Behalf Of Tim Cook
Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2000 6:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openhealth-list
Subject: Re: license issue: GT.M and VISTA
pschloeffel wrote:
> How the use of "proprietary closed source" tools such as ISE Eiffel
invalidates
> the legitimacy of the GEHR kernel as an Open Source product (ie "the real
> thing") is beyond my understanding.
I agree Peter. But it would be interesting to at least explore
the capabilities of Python as a language that could be used. Is
there a known reason why it is not suitable?
-- Tim Cook --
Office: (901) 884-4126 8am-5pm CST
Free Practice Management,Inc. | http://FreePM.org
Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom.
